This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Learn function name by its address

From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: André Pönitz <andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:35:22 -0700
Subject: Re: Learn function name by its address
References: <8763ekb9ql.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> <8ac60eac0906250853y3f70e3b1y2bf97674b1e83d7b@mail.gmail.com> <200906260838.31341.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <8ac60eac0906260004t4b78c1ffv47eedd2ecb4662f4@mail.gmail.com> <m3ljnedhzf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Tom Tromey<tromey@redhat.com> wrote:

> If you have a list ready, would you mind writing a patch to remove
> them from the documentation?

As Nick Roberts said earlier in the thread, these can be identified by

  Example ... N.A.

marker. I just didn't know what that meant.

I think removing them would be incorrect: they do exist, MI accepts them,
they just don't work :-(

Perhaps add a "NOTE: This command has not yet been implemented" to each one?

-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Learn function name by its address
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Learn function name by its address
  - From: Dmitry Dzhus
- Re: Learn function name by its address
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: Learn function name by its address
  - From: André Pönitz
- Re: Learn function name by its address
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: Learn function name by its address
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]