This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: processing-instruction()

From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:05:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [xsl] processing-instruction()
References: <FF93BF7E67F5D511859B0004AC3696C023E130@nrcmrdex1b.imsb.nrc.ca><200207311427.PAA16738@penguin.nag.co.uk> <50-2123935187.20020731154839@jenitennison.com>
Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com

> Actually, I think the processing-instruction('Eqn') matching template
> has a priority of 0 while the node() matching template has a priority
> of -0.5:

Actually, so did I, and rather than do my usual trick of quoting the
spec (incorrectly) from memory I fired it up and read the default
priority rules before posting my answer...

Of course I forgot to take into account that I'm getting too old to 
read the spec and skipped over the  *or has the form...
bit:-) Oh well...

David


_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

References:
- processing-instruction()
  - From: Jiang, Peiyun
- Re: processing-instruction()
  - From: David Carlisle
- Re: processing-instruction()
  - From: Jeni Tennison

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]