This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: James Clark on Schema
- From: "Mark Wonsil" <wonsil at 4m-ent dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:06:33 -0400
- Subject: RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Mr. Melton concludes:
> My conclusion is this: As bad as many observers and
> participants think XML
> Schema to be, it is appropriate for it to be the basis for
> XQuery 1.0,
> XPath 2.0, and XSLT 2.0. To hope that the various Working
> Groups will "see
> the light" and choose to use a schema-like facility defined
> outside the W3C
> is highly unlikely. An tremendous investment has already
> been made in XML
> Schema by many companies (including mine, of course) and I am highly
> skeptical that they will toss that investment away lightly.
Are you suggesting that if we build it, they will come? Instead of reciting
the "good money after bad" line, I will leave you with this thought:
Microsoft Bob/Office Assistant
;-)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list