This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: xsltproc (was Re: XSL-List Digest V4 #417)
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin at mitretek dot org>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:36:58 -0400
- Subject: Re: [xsl] xsltproc (was Re: XSL-List Digest V4 #417)
- References: <200206051930.PAA16388@biglist.com> <20020605221316.GH28855@swordfish.havenrock.com>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
What about Xalan C++? Free, Linux and Windows versions. Worth trying.
Tom P
[Matt Gushee]
> Zack Brown asked:
>
> > Any recommendations for an xslt processor that:
>
> > * is freely available for Linux
> > * is at least as fast as xsltproc
>
> Unlikely. My understanding is that xsltproc is the fastest XSLT
> processor in existence, with the possible exception of MSXML.
>
> Most popular XSLT processors are written in Java, Python, or Perl:
> Saxon, Xalan, 4XSLT ... xsltproc is faster than them by a wide and
> probably permanent margin.
>
> I guess Sablotron is pretty fast, but I have heard it has standards-
> compliance issues. Haven't really used it myself, so that's all
> second-hand information.
>
> --
> Matt Gushee
> Englewood, Colorado, USA
> mgushee@havenrock.com
> http://www.havenrock.com/
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list