This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: collection of differences in XSL-FO implementations
- From: Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz at codeconsult dot ch>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 17:02:56 +0100
- Subject: Re: [xsl] collection of differences in XSL-FO implementations
- Organization: codeconsult
- References: <72A41F90745C8A4A89EBFD44512C99E82F0C30@bonn29.bonn.fiscus.de>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
On Monday 04 March 2002 16:23, Fries, Markus, fiscus GmbH, Bonn wrote:
> I am using fop.0.20.2, fop.0.20.3 and xep 2.7 and get different
> results sometimes. Since the company might change between the
> products it is necessary to protocoll the differences experienced and
> creating respective test files.
>. . .
NIST has created an XSL-FO test suite (see
http://xw2k.sdct.itl.nist.gov/xml/page5.html), but I don't know if
anyone has already documented the results of running it on various
products, but it would certainly be helpful.
--
Bertrand Delacrétaz (codeconsult.ch, jfor.org)
buzzwords: XML, java, XSLT, cocoon, mentoring/teaching/coding.
disclaimer: eternity is very long. mostly towards the end. get ready.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list