This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re: RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
- From: DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:23:56 -0000
- Subject: RE: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re: [xsl] RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> From: Gunther Schadow [mailto:gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org]
> > anyone arguing for the addition of an new scoping mechanism
> > needs to argue that the benefits are worth the costs, given
> > the features proposed in xslt 2.
>
> So, what are the disadvantages of dynamic scoping?
>
> I really would like to hear some more voices about this issue,
> for and against dynamic scoping. I am ready to accept not
> having it if someone can make an argument why exactly it is
> bad. It is certainly not enough to just say that it's bad
> repeatedly.
>
> So, the two questions to answer is
>
> (A) where do functional arguments play a role in XSLT at all?
> I cannot see any way to pass functions as arguments or return
> functions from functions in XSLT.
Just one more voice then, after the volume of mail on this subject, mostly
from Gunther.
I don't believe Gunther's case, as one of only two supporters of this case,
is sufficient
for the WG to consider inclusion of dynamic scoping in 2.0.
Personally I've heard enough on the subject.
Regareds DaveP.
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list