This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: translets vs. templates
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael dot h dot kay at ntlworld dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:10:44 -0000
- Subject: RE: [xsl] translets vs. templates
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
The biggest benefit from XSLTC comes, I think, from the size of the
translets, making them easy to download and execute client-side. Execution
speed is faster than most interpreters, but not dramatically so. This is
because most of the work (building the tree, sorting, serializing) is
exactly the same whether the stylesheet is compiled or not.
Mike Kay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of
> James Parsons
> Sent: 14 December 2001 14:48
> To: XSL-List@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: [xsl] translets vs. templates
>
>
> I am trying to get a handle on XSLTC and its benefits. In terms of
> performance in a server environment, is there an advantage to
> transforming
> with translets, rather than cached Templates? My hunch is
> that they are
> probably a dead heat with the only advantage (and possibly occasional
> disadvantage) of translets being persistence across server restarts...
>
> -Jim Parsons
> -Ars Digita Corporation
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list