This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: msxml2: What can be used instead of <xsl:variable>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: Re: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used instead of <xsl:variable>
- From: "cutlass" <cutlass at secure0 dot com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 11:24:26 +0100
- References: <07D07AD1C8CAD4119B0900D0B7E7E8E0649B01@uhura.memiq.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
hello
we all understand your situation, but we would be doing you a disservice if
we suggest anything else.
your options
a) continue using ancient version
b) provide a method of upgrading clients
ancient means, broken, not to spec, etc.....we dont speak that here, its not
even a dialect, its something completely different.... there is a code
convertor listed at www.netcrucible.com that will convert xsl to xslt.
there is a simple msxml sniffer at www.bayes.co.uk/xml and online installer,
that could assist in upgrading your clients.
you would be doing a disservice to your clients if u do not recc. a base
client requirement that uses proper software.
good luck, jim fuller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dmitri Ilyin" <dmitri.ilyin@memIQ.com>
To: <xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used instead of <xsl:variable>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Kay [mailto:mhkay@iclway.co.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:15 PM
> > To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> > Subject: RE: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used instead of <xsl:variable>
> >
> >
> > > What can i use with msxml2 instead of <xsl:variable>???
> > >
> > You can't. Remember that msxml2 was based on an early working
> > draft of (what
> > became) XSLT, and that the language was vastly improved
> > between the draft
> > and the final spec. You are using ancient, creaking, obsolete
> > technology,
> > and your only reasonable strategy is to upgrade rather than
> > fighting its
> > limitations.
>
> That is what i don't understand. The mostly installed IE version there is
5
> and 5.5. They are all have msxml2.5.
> The microsoft were rather soon on markt with their "XSL". I can imagine
> there is a couple of Applications there, that use it.
> Why don't they (microsoft) support it properly any more....
>
> Unfortunately i can not force internet user to upgrade only for using my
> application. So i have to fight ;).
>
> regards
>
> Dmitri
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list