This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan
- From: "Dylan Walsh" <Dylan dot Walsh at Kadius dot com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:12:59 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
To clarify: the syntax for a "text declaration" is exactly the same as
an XML declaration e.g.:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
Is that correct?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Carlisle [SMTP:davidc@nag.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:30 AM
> To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element:
> Saxon & XT vs. Xalan
>
>
> > out of curiousity, would the above output be a well-formed external
> > general parsed entity, given that it starts with an xml declaration?
>
> _if_ it started with an xml declaration it wouldn't be a well formed
> external
> general parsed entity, but that wasn't an xml declaration (despite the
> attribute name on xml-output) it was a text declaration.
>
> David
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively
> call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list