This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
- From: James Melton <james dot melton at cylogix dot com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:12:54 -0400
- References: <000c01c0f8d0$7a391060$1201a8c0@fuseboxk1>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
There another issue you may want to consider. If your company is already
using Xalan, you are doing something of a disservice in introducing
another XSLT processor (unless of course you are making a strategic,
company-wide decision and everyone will eventually use your selection).
kfricovsky wrote:
>
> Currently we use XALAN here at work.
>
> I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most
> familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML.
>
> I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead?
>
> Does any particlar processor have greater benefits than the other?
>
> Looking for your objective opinion,
>
> Thanks...
>
> -Kevin
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
--
____________________________________________________________
James Melton CyLogix
609.750.5190 609.750.5100
james.melton@cylogix.com www.cylogix.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list