This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
- To: "'xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
- From: "Schwartz, Rechell R, NLCIO" <rrschwartz at att dot com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:35:48 -0400
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Is Saxon compatible with the Apache XML Parser (Xerces) or does one
need to install a SAXON XML parser too?
Rechell Schwartz
-----Original Message-----
From: Goetz Bock [mailto:bock@blacknet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:03 PM
To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
On Tue, Jun 19 '01 at 10:59, kfricovsky wrote:
> Currently we use XALAN here at work.
>
> I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most
> familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML.
Xalan and Saxon are both Java programe, MSXML only works on Windows.
> I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead?
I go with saxon, where ever I can, but I use MSXML 3.0(sp1) for
Clientside XSL-T (it's limited for IE only, but thats ok for these
special cases)
Goetz.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list