This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: nested templates?
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: [xsl] nested templates?
- From: Wendell Piez <wapiez at mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:26:06 +0100
- References: <B7280FED.9C92%enigma@turingstudio.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
At 07:52 PM 5/16/01, Chris wrote [about nested templates]:
> >The above seems to be illegal, though I can't think of a good reason why.
> >
>i've often wondered that myself
>it would get around a lot of problems and avoid a lot of cases where you
>need to use modes
But, hypothetically, what would be the difference between these
hypothetical nested-and-scoped templates, and the not-so-hypothetical (but
often misapplied, and hence warned-against) xsl:for-each?
I suppose it would be okay for beginners to use nested templates? :->
Cheers,
Wendell
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list