This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: [XSLT] [Q] Recursion
- To: XSL <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT] [Q] Recursion
- From: Jonathan Calvert <jonathan_calvert at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:32:47 -0800 (PST)
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:21:49 +0000
> From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com>
> What's wrong with:
Absoultly nothing. Thank you for the suggestion.
> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
> xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
> <xsl:template match="RECORD">
> <xsl:number level="any"/>
> <xsl:text> </xsl:text>
> <xsl:value-of select="INFO1"/>
> <xsl:text>&#A;</xsl:text>
> </xsl:template>
> </xsl:stylesheet>
> No counting or recursion required: this is letting
> XSL's processing model do all the work.
This makes a lot of sense. As M. Kay pointed out in a
later response, my excessive counting was probably the
cause for the performance decease, not the recursion.
> Was it the xsl:number instruction you forgot about?
Yes, to be honest I complete missed this instruction.
I told my boss that it had to be user error. :)
> I'm assuming the processing model is not mysterious
> to you at this point. (If it is, let us know.)
I think I have a pretty decent idea of "what is what,"
but obviously I need to take a second look at each
instruction/element.
Thank you again for taking the time to post your suggestion.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list