This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSL tranformation performance
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL tranformation performance
- From: "Hahn, Kimberly" <Kim dot Hahn at enform dot com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:40:27 -0600
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
This may not be what you are doing, but if you are using a DOM to pull the
XML (Load method) make sure that you do NOT have it set to asynchronous.
The kind of performance degradation you are reporting was something that
cleared up when the asynch property was set to false.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Tara
Chatterton
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 3:45 AM
To: 'XSL-List@lists.mulberrytech.com'
Subject: [xsl] XSL tranformation performance
I have an XSL transformation being applied to an XML recordset containing
approx 400 records. I have the xsl transformation specified in the XML.
When I view the XML page in IE 5 the page takes approx 20 secs to load.
(This is great and all is well with the world!). How I really want to use
this xml is in an asp. In my web application I have the same XML as before
being returned and I am performing a response.write on that XML string.
When displaying the XML dynamically like this the page takes approx 7
minutes!!!!!! to load. Why is there this difference in performance? When
using response.write on a string of the same length the string is displayed
almost instantaneously. Is there another way to display the XML
dynamically?
ILLY COMPUTER SYSTEMS
Coppergate House, 16 Brune Street, London, E1 7NJ, United Kingdom
Tel +44 (0) 20 7721 7757 Fax +44 (0) 20 7721 7385
General Enquiries: Info@illycorp.com
Website www.illycorp.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list