This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: [exsl] EXSLT 1.0 - Common, Sets and Math
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] [exsl] EXSLT 1.0 - Common, Sets and Math
- From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay at iclway dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:10:15 -0000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> Hi Mike,
>
> > I think it might be prudent to take <exsl:function> out of this, or
> > at least park it in a separate section, on the grounds that
> > specifying it is causing some difficulty, and it's probably an area
> > where implementors will want to wait and see what the official
> > standard comes up with.
>
> Which part of which official standard are you referring to?
I was referring to XSLT 2.0. I know it's a long wait, but I suspect
implementors will wait to see what the spec says rather than do something
interim. Adding standalone extension functions is one thing, adding
significant mechanisms is another. (Especially for implementors who, unlike
me, claim to make a commitment to their users).
Mike
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list