This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Performance -- Re: RE:"*NEVER* use for-each"
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: Re: Performance -- Re: [xsl] RE:"*NEVER* use for-each"
- From: "Anjul Srivastava" <anjul at netzero dot net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:56:25 -0800
- References: <80CE1FE86529D211A84D00A02461F05A0944C8BD@USPLM210>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> converting them to MBNA core system, BRILLIANT!), reusable (always good),
> reuse (oops, repeated yourself), etc. Good job.
reusable = write modules that can be reused
reuse = try not to write modules -- try to find modules that others have
written and reuse them
I did mean them as separate characteristics of a good design and wasn't
repeating myself.
Thanks for your comments. About the "for-each", well, where does design end
and implementation begin? I try to "design" the code for the small functions
of the most derived classes that I write! But anyway, that would push me
over the off-topic line if I am not already.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list