This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: Francis Norton <francis at redrice dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:22:20 +0000
- References: <OFCD7F9D60.69579C28-ON852569F2.006B62B9@lotus.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote:
>
> Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com> wrote:
> > does this mean you would favour XSLT extensions in XSLT
> >(<saxon:function> style)
>
> I don't know of anyone who's against this. It's a matter of getting the
> design right... there are complications when you get into the details. I
> would rather see this laid on top of XSLT 2.0, since I think there are type
> system ramifications.
>
I don't know about the XSLT 2.0 type agenda - can you suggest any useful
links?
Can you be a bit more specific about which XSLT 2.0 style "type system
ramifications" a <saxon:function> feature would raise that aren't
already raised in <xsl:script>?
Francis.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list