This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:38:35 -0800 (PST)
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
--- James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote:
> Adam Van Den Hoven wrote:
>
> > If I write a document that I can say is 100% XSLT
> > compliant, then I demand that when I use that
> document in a processor that
> > is 100% compliant the resulting output is exactly
> as I have specified.
>
> This is not the case in XSLT 1.0. For example:
>
> - Stylesheets that use extensions (whether extension
> functions or
> extension elements) are 100% XSLT compliant, but
> there is not guarantee
> that a processor will be able to handle them.
>
> - XSLT 1.0 also allows extension of output methods
> and sorting
> datatypes, which are not guaranteed to be supported.
>
> - XSLT 1.0 processors are not required to support
> disable-output-escaping.
O.K.
but if I use neither scripts nor extensions, I'm
pretty safe = my XSLTs are pretty portable.
What is left if I also don't use
disable-output-escaping?
Tobi
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list