Re: [xsl] XSLT or DOM or SAX?

["Craig Pfeifer" <cpfeifer at acm dot org>]

Thanks for your response. I'm currently tasked w/figuring out how to break
large WML decks into smaller, device friendly decks. I was having a hard
time w/it in XSLT and.wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.

Craig

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Robertson" <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
To: <xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT or DOM or SAX?


> At 07:50 3/01/2001, Craig Pfeifer wrote:
>
> >I wanted to know how you knew if/when you have reached the limits of
XSLT,
> >and it's time to look at a DOM / SAX solution? What sorts of
> >transformations are too difficult/awkward to accomplish in XSLT and are
> >better left to DOM / SAX implementations?
>
> DOM/SAX seems a pretty low-level alternative
> to XSLT.
>
> You might want to have a look at Omnimark
> instead for more complex transformations.
>
> J
>
> -------------------------
> James Robertson
> Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
> SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
> Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution
>
> http://www.steptwo.com.au/
> jamesr@steptwo.com.au
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list