This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Fallback from document() error
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Fallback from document() error
- From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila at idoox dot com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 13:58:16 +0100
- References: <6B2A5AEA929FD411AE41009027CA88E34ECEC1@WWMESSD048>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I would gladly accept any form of exception handling.
I have proposed xsl:fallback as it is already a part of XSLT spec
so the only syntactic change is an increase in the number of elements
xsl:fallback can be used in and I do not consider reasonable to have 2
different exception mechanisms in one language.
Are there any plans from XSLT working group?
Kay Michael wrote:
>
> There is certainly a need for some kind of exception handling mechanism
> here, though I'm not sure xsl:fallback is the right answer.
>
> Mike Kay
>
> > Being quite often plagued by problems with
> > document('foo.xml') function when foo() does not exist
> > I was wandering about means how to solve it.
> >
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
--
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>
<surname> Nic </surname>
<mail> nicmila@idoox.com </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org </support>
<zvonMailingList>
http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4
</zvonMailingList>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list