Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman at CraneSoftwrights dot com>]

At 00/10/17 20:18 -0700, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
>XT is dead, I think. It has no saxon:evaluate ;-)

I do not believe the measurement of the value of an XSLT processor is in 
the support of a proprietary extension.

XT is just fine for many people.  Personally, I use the key() function 
quite a bit so for that reason I am obliged to use other processors for 
some of my more recent work, but I still have faith in the use of XT for a 
lot of my production work where I don't need that function.

I feel your implications of needing to support proprietary extensions may 
be misleading to those new to the technology.

................. Ken

--
G. Ken Holman                    mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.             http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0   +1(613)489-0999   (Fax:-0995)
Web site: XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML services, training, libraries, products.
Book: Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath ISBN1-894049-05-5
Article:          What is XSLT? http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/08/holman
Next public instructor-led training:     2000-10-03/05,2000-10-09/10,
-        2000-10-19,2000-11-06/07,2000-11-12,2000-12-03/04,2001-01-27


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list