This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
- From: James Robertson <jamesr at steptwo dot com dot au>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:29:54 +1000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
At 23:03 7/09/2000, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> > OmniMark advantages :
> > - Less resource hogging
>
>I beg to differ. Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with
>Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program.
I think Omnimark will take as much memory is
available, but no more.
How much memory would be required when using
XSLT to parse 150Mb? (Several gig?)
J
-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list