This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: include vs. xsl:import
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: include vs. xsl:import
- From: Matthew Bentley <Matthew dot bentley at brookers dot co dot nz>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:42:40 +1200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
From my recent experience, using xsl:include is useful for trouble-shooting
(detecting)
duplicate template matches/named templates (In those cases where duplicates
should not exist).
I see no other apparent reason for it being in the spec -
Cheers,
matt
******************************************************************
Warning: This email, including any attachments,
is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only.
Republication and redissemination,
including posting to news groups or web pages,
is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Brooker's Limited.
******************************************************************
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list