This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Schema Element Definiton Order
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Schema Element Definiton Order
- From: Lee Goddard <lee dot goddard at bigfoot dot com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 13:40:02 +0100
- Organization: School of Cognitive Science, University of Sussex
- References: <396324AE.696B0C18@bigfoot.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
David Carlisle wrote:
>
> er, wrong list I think! That wasn't an XSL question.
>
> David
But aren't XML schema's XSL elements? See how confused I am!
Sorry!
lee
Lee Goddard wrote:
>
> I've a need for a schema that has a series of nodes which
> can have children. These children can be any of the fore-
> mentioned nodes.
>
> My question is: which should I define first? I think it
> was in the MSXML3 docs that I read that no <ElementType...>
> definition should contain <element type...> references to
> undefined elements. If this is true, am I in an
> impossible situation?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Lee
>
> --
> Lee Goddard <l.goddard@sussex>
> Research Centre for Cognitive Science,
> University of Sussex, Brighton UK
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
--
Lee Goddard <l.goddard@sussex>
Research Centre for Cognitive Science,
University of Sussex, Brighton UK
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list