This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: xsl self-documentation - weave
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: xsl self-documentation - weave
- From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA at stibo dot dk>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:37:26 +0200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> I take particlular note of your comment that 'trace' is much
> more often used than 'weave'.
I think that the target audience of these methods are different. For me, a weaved document is intended to be _documentation_ for other people to read, where the trace-target -- again for me -- is intended to be a debugging aid (since good debuggers do not exist for XSLT yet).
The overlap between these two is probably not very large.
> Unsure how Norm uses them, but I'm guessing he's weaving
> rather than tracing.
These are still under development into a larger documentation system targetting towards a DocBook document, similar to the DocBook Guide. His approach is basically based on top-level nodes.
I would still like to see a simulation of the output desired from a trace-run, since that will most likely clarify matters a lot.
--
Thorbjørn
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list