Re: Netscape Support for XSL - client vs server rant

[Matt Sergeant <matt at sergeant dot org>]

On Tue, 23 May 2000, Keith Visco wrote:

> 
> Again I apologize for off-topic responses, but I need to continue this
> on the same forum in which it started to make sure the "air is cleared".
> 
> Heather is right.
> 
> After reading her previous posting, where she clarified what she meant,
> I realize I completely misunderstood her. It took me a couple times of
> re-reading to realize she was actually being sarcastic. To me the
> sarcasm was very subtle...but was present.
> 
> So Heather, I apologize, and I am very pleased to do so. I am glad to
> have misunderstood the meaning of your words, than to learn that you
> actually feel the way I originally thought. My biggest mistake was not
> going to Heather first, and giving her the opportunity to clarify what
> she meant.
> 
> One really disappointing thing for me, however, is that I have received
> lots of private e-mail from people, stating they actually feel the way I
> originally thought Heather felt. I will never understand how people can
> feel this way. 

Probably because they're now in the MS generated "something for
nothing" culture that was created by pouring $600,000,000 into developing
IE and MSXML, rather than the "something for everyone" culture that you're
working in... Just a thought.

-- 
<Matt/>

Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list