This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSL-FO processor
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: XSL-FO processor
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 16:55:07 +0100 (BST)
- References: <20000503150729.24269.qmail@web4104.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Sydney writes:
> I want to know if there is another XSL-FO other than
> FOP for free.
in the (probably unlikely) event you are a TeX user,
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/passivetex/ implements a lot of XSL FO of
last year. Changes to XSL FO March 2000 syntax coming later today. it
is NOT properly conformant (and it is unlikely that it ever will be,
to be honest; supporting some of them thar properties is beyond me at
present)
PassiveTeX has been used to typeset a real book, now being published,
which is probably more than one can say for FOP, RenderX or Arbortext:-}
Sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list