This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
XSL FO conformance
- To: xsl-editors at w3 dot org
- Subject: XSL FO conformance
- From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 18:02:38 +0100
- cc: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
In the March 27th draft, section 8 discusses conformance; for
formatting objects, Appendix B says whether or not an FO is "basic" or
"extended". But Appendix C does not do the same for properties. Is
there a list somewhere which I have missed?
Also on conformance:
a) why is <table-footer> extended, but
<table-header> basic? why would anyone be able to implement one but
not the other?
b) I fear I miss an explanation of how to do lists in "basic" mode,
without <list-item-label>. can anyone expound?
Sebastian "hoping for basic conformance" Rahtz
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list