This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: XSLT vs Omnimark


I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what
productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl.  Obviously we all need
the fastest method, yet one that follows standards.  Please advise
(the silent mediator)

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Geimer [mailto:Rick.Geimer@nsc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 12:39 PM
To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: XSLT vs Omnimark


Didier PH Martin wrote:

> So Paul, Omnimark is nearer to XSLT concepts than PERL. To compare PERL
with
> XSLT is like comparing potatoes with oranges but comparing Omnimark to
XSLT
> is like comparing two kinds of oranges.
> 

Actually, comparing XSLT to OmniMark is like comparing an orange tree to
a bunch of oranges coming down a high speed assembly line, but I
digress... :-)

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@nsc.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]