This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java
- From: Kay Michael <Michael dot Kay at icl dot com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:30:14 -0000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> I should have made that clear. My times are not from
> beginning to end of command line execution. I am performing the
transformation
> inside my own Java code. I don't start the clock until immediately before
> the call to perform the transformation and I stop the clock upon return
from that
> method.
Doing this you've cut out a lot of the cold-start overhead from your timing
but not all. I generally run the thing three times, the second and third
times round are about 70% of the first time cost. I think this is because of
Java class loading and incremental compilation.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list