This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Character entities
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Character entities
- From: Frederic Schwebel <schwebel at handy dot univ-lyon1 dot fr>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:19:42 +0100 (MET)
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Hi,
I had problems with characters sets, too. This URL helped me a lot :
http://freespace.virgin.net/b.pawson/xsl/xslcharacters.html
(main entrance is the famous DaveP FAQ : http://www.dpawson.co.uk/)
Regards
Frederic
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Beckers, Marc wrote:
> You're right. All of you.
> I ignorantly said "garbage" because that is what we saw
> when we further converted our DocBook instances to HTML
> and traced these characters to the first XSL/XT run.
> So I guess I have to take a closer look at our character
> set settings all the way down the production line.
> Does HTML "know" UTF-8?
> Thanks,
> Marc
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sebastian Rahtz
> > [mailto:sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 4:32 PM
> > To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> > Cc: adepters@arbortext.com
> > Subject: Re: Character entities
> >
> >
> > Beckers, Marc writes:
> > > With the output method set to "xml", however, references
> > > to certain character entities result in garbage. Specifically:
> > > ldquo, rdquo, ndash, mdash and sect. With output method
> > set to "html",
> > ...
> >
> > accept that they are *not* garbage, but are perfectly
> > `normal' bits of
> > UTF-8. No?
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list