This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: Wrecking Revisited
- From: Hans Ronne <hronne at comhem dot se>
- To: Elijah Meeks <elijahmeeks at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 21:11:20 +0200
- Subject: Re: Wrecking Revisited
- References: <1085247439.1485.408.camel@localhost.localdomain>
>I think designers would be better served if the code
>simply vanished any disallowed unit without reporting
>an error. I can't see much reason for it to work like
>it does, but maybe I'm missing something.
My recollection is that this is how the wrecking code should work, i.e.
wrecks that cannot belong to their assigned side should simply vanish. So
you may have found a bug. Or possibly an overzealous run warning.
Hans