This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: update material display


On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Jim Kingdon wrote:

> "K" should be "k" but other than that, I don't have much of an
> opinion.  Source: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/prefixes.html and
> http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html (Upper case "K" is
> usually a synonym for what would be better abbreviated "Ki").

Of course Peter is from .au, so he is not "bound" by a .us 
.gov entity such as NIST.  But, what you refer to is essentially 
international convention.  The binary units are less 
well-accepted; how many mebibytes of RAM do you see advertised?

Eric


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]