This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: printable online docs
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:27:47AM -0500, James R. Dunson wrote:
> In the meantime, IMO the most useful formats to have the docs in is some
> sort of "source" format that is the official version, and to have readily
> available converters for plain ASCII, HTML and PDF that preserve as much of
> the structure as practical in their respective formats. A direct
> Postscript version might occasionally be handy for printing, but I suspect
> that anyone who needs that can use Ghostscript off of the PDF format, so it
> would be a much lower priority. The source format should probably be based
> on ASCII with tags, so that it is amenable to various sorts of diff, grep,
> and patch commands.
i agree totally on that one, as sayd some xml like format, even if not
docbook, would be IHMO nice....
even xHTML would do...
--
ciao bboett
==============================================================
bboett@adlp.org <- UPDATE your address books please!!! CHANGE!
http://inforezo.u-strasbg.fr/~bboett
===============================================================
the total amount of intelligence on earth is constant.
human population is growing....