This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug translator/22087] New: implicitptr.exp failing after the bpf merge
- From: "dsmith at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:33:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug translator/22087] New: implicitptr.exp failing after the bpf merge
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22087
Bug ID: 22087
Summary: implicitptr.exp failing after the bpf merge
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: translator
Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
Reporter: dsmith at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
On 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64, when run with the pre-bpf code, the
systemtap.base/implicitptr.exp test gets 18 passes. With HEAD, the test gets 11
passes and 8 UNTESTED items, which really means that "stap -l" fails where it
didn't before.
Here's an example. Pre-bpf code:
====
PASS: implicitptr.c compile m64-O
stap -L process("implicitptr.exe").statement("foo@*:13") reports:
listified:
exe_uses_implicit_ptr caught: child process exited abnormally
UNTESTED: probe listing implicitptr-m64-O
====
HEAD:
====
PASS: implicitptr.c compile m64-O
stap -L process("implicitptr.exe").statement("foo@*:13") reports:
process("/root/rhel7-prebpf/testsuite/implicitptr.exe").statement("foo@/root/src.prebpf/testsuite/systemtap.base/implicitptr.c:13")
$j:int* $k:int** $l:int*** $i:int
PASS: probe listing implicitptr-m64-O (ijkl)
====
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.