This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tapsets/20136] Use the @const() operator across the tapset scripts.


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20136

Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fche at redhat dot com

--- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
I wonder if this weird phenomenon could be corrected by a simplification of the
way @const() is implemented.  What if it were purely a parse-time syntax, that
the parser itself expanded to an embedded_expr %{ ... %} business?  So the
staptree.* stuff wouldn't need a const_op machinery at all; your test case
would just work (tm) since post-pass-1, the elaboration code can't even see
@const.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]