This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug dyninst/17359] systemtap in dyninst mode fails to hit PLT probes


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17359

Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jistone at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> ---
Yes, I'm not surprised.  Dyninst does instruction-level analysis to determine
how to safely relocate code for instrumentation.  But indirect jumps are opaque
control flow to this analysis, and usually Dyninst just decides it's unsafe to
proceed.  In theory it would be fine, since we do know this is well-behaved, so
perhaps Dyninst could learn a heuristic to identify and allow PLT
instrumentation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]