This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: Prelinking on ARM
- From: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
- To: Torsten Polle <Torsten dot Polle at gmx dot de>
- Cc: systemtap at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 20:28:01 +0200
- Subject: Re: Prelinking on ARM
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <m28uc36tyi dot fsf at gmx dot de>
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 22:43 +0200, Torsten Polle wrote:
> I've a problem with prelinked shared and non-prelinked debug information
> for the same on ARM. The relative offset to the .text section differs
> for the prelinked shared library and the non-prelinked debug
> information. SystemTap only compensates for the difference in the start
> addresses. I tried to debug the problem, but I've to admit that the
> problem is well over my head. Could someone give me a hint on this
> matter?
Does the testsuite/systemtap.exelib/exelib.exp test work for you?
# Builds various variants of an executable and a shared library
# (with gcc/g++, -O0/-O3, prelinked/pie, seperate debuginfo)
# Then runs tests with a list of execs.
# Don't enable all sub-tests by default, enable them separately when
# you want to track down an issue.
# Enable just the all-in-one test for regular test runs to safe time
#set subtestlist {lib mark uname ustack cleanup}
make installcheck RUNTESTFLAGS=exelib.exp
Which for me on an x86_64 and a armv7hl give:
Snapshot: version 2.8/0.160, commit release-2.7-126-gf80d9cdb3078
GCC: 4.8.3 [gcc (GCC) 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-9)]
Distro: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 7.1 (Maipo)
SElinux: Enforcing
Running /home/mark/src/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.exelib/exelib.exp ...
=== systemtap Summary ===
# of expected passes 376
Snapshot: version 2.8/0.161, commit release-2.7-160-g1eed3df165bc +
changes
GCC: 5.1.1 [gcc (GCC) 5.1.1 20150422 (Red Hat 5.1.1-1)]
Distro: Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two)
SElinux: Enforcing
Running ./systemtap.exelib/exelib.exp ...
=== systemtap Summary ===
# of expected passes 188
(arm has half the number of passes since x86_64 actually does twice as
many tests, for both normal 64bits binaries and for an -m32 binaries.)
If the above doesn't match what you see on your setup could you enable
the subtests as indicated in the .exp file and see which particular
subtests fail (maybe include the relevant parts of the
testsuite/systemtap.log file).
Thanks,
Mark