[Bug translator/17906] The test to restrict nearest probes to ABSOLUTE and RELATIVE causing unprivileged_probes.exp tests with wildcards to fail

["jlebon at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17906

Jonathan Lebon <jlebon at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jlebon at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Lebon <jlebon at redhat dot com> ---
Hey Will,

Thanks for reporting this, looks like I didn't catch it when I made the change.
If I remember correctly, the reasoning was that it didn't make sense to have
wildcards with .nearest. E.g. .statement("foo@file.c:15").nearest and
.statement("foo@file.c+3").nearest have clear meanings (use the nearest
probe-able addrs to these linenos).

On the other hand, with .statement("foo@file.c:*").nearest, since "*" already
means "expand to all possible probe-able linenos", adding a .nearest makes no
difference since they will all already be valid linenos. In that sense, I guess
we could allow the syntax without really changing behaviour. At the time, I
leaned on the stricter interpretation of "this is redundant so the user
probably meant something else".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.