This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [SYSTEMTAP/PATCH v2 0/6] RT aware systemtap patch set
- From: Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista dot com>
- To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
- Cc: David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com>, Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com>, systemtap at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:26:45 +0530
- Subject: Re: [SYSTEMTAP/PATCH v2 0/6] RT aware systemtap patch set
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1410871795-12539-1-git-send-email-sshukla at mvista dot com> <y0m8uljd3wp dot fsf at fche dot csb> <CAAyOgsaNmYGTC_3funSzEyqw-qKkWaCRy7dwqM8cGTG--M3wrQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAAyOgsZux_9cBBZgLrYdM+rZSW6_2wjTyU90Tum_avN6xDFT4Q at mail dot gmail dot com>
Installing dejagnu solves the problem.. Pl. ignore. Sorry for noise. Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
> Frank suggested me to run "make installcheck" on -rt and not-rt mode
> which I tried and got build failure saying "./execrc: line 4: runtest:
> command not found". Anyone knows how to fix this.
>
> I am building/testing vanilla kernel version 3.14.12-rt9 on x86
> Ivybridge box [12 cores HT].
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> [...] This is a v2 version of -rt aware systemtap patchset, tested
>>>> for 3.14.12-rt9 and for 3.10.40-rt38 kernel version. [...]
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> Test script used for testing :
>>>> /usr/local/stap/bin/stap -v testsuite/systemtap.examples/network/netdev.stp
>>>> /usr/local/stap/bin/stap -v testsuite/systemtap.examples/network/tcpdumplike.stp
>>>> [...]
>>>> Like know feedback, comment on patch set. also Does it make sense to maintain
>>>> systemtap -rt version in upstream.. do we care?
>>>
>>> Thanks to Josh for looking into this in more detail. I only have the
>>> general observation that this patchset would be desirable in mainline
>>> stap, but only if it is tested by at least the whole testsuite (rather
>>> than just those two samples) on your -rt kernel, *and* if the patched
>>> code also runs the whole testsuite on a non-rt kernel. (We don't
>>> expect 100% PASS, but also no smoke attributable to the patches.)
>>>
>>
>> Agree, Could you point me testsuite to trigger and test.. I looked
>> perhaps not so much keenly.. so it would be good to know right
>> pointers about testing details .. I can run test and present the
>> report. let me know. Also Any performance specific testsuite too? I
>> did asked for in v1 patchset.
>> Thanks.
>>> - FChE