This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [PATCH -tip v8 19/26] kprobes: Show blacklist entries via debugfs
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis dot org>
- To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com>
- Cc: linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org, Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel dot org>, Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth at in dot ibm dot com>, Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa dot prabhu at linaro dot org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec at gmail dot com>, x86 at kernel dot org, fche at redhat dot com, mingo at redhat dot com, systemtap at sourceware dot org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor dot com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix dot de>, "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft dot net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:19:09 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v8 19/26] kprobes: Show blacklist entries via debugfs
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140305115843 dot 22766 dot 8355 dot stgit at ltc230 dot yrl dot intra dot hitachi dot co dot jp> <20140305120056 dot 22766 dot 10704 dot stgit at ltc230 dot yrl dot intra dot hitachi dot co dot jp>
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:00:56 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:
> kernel/kprobes.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index a21b4e6..3214289 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -2249,6 +2249,46 @@ static const struct file_operations debugfs_kprobes_operations = {
> .release = seq_release,
> };
>
> +/* kprobes/blacklist -- shows which functions can not be probed */
> +static void *kprobe_blacklist_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + return seq_list_start(&kprobe_blacklist, *pos);
> +}
> +
> +static void *kprobe_blacklist_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + return seq_list_next(v, &kprobe_blacklist, pos);
> +}
> +
Can modules use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and have items being added to the
list as this is being read? That is, do we need locks?
Also, are items removed. I need to go back and look at the
implementation of NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(), I'm just writing this as I think
about it ;-)
-- Steve