This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tapsets/16472] long chain of nested function calls consumes a lot of empty whitespace due to thread_indent() function


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16472

--- Comment #4 from fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com ---
I agree. Having thread_indent_depth(delta:long) return the number directly (as
oppose to string) is better and more flexible.

You are correct on the post-increment/pre-decrement call/return behavior.
Although, if this difference by one for call/return is consistent (which it
would be) across all entry/returns then it does not matter. But for lesser
confusion, lets keep the call/return reported at the same level as you
suggested. 

Thanks for your help. Do you have any idea when this might be merged?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]