This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: Segmenation fault for systemtap tests using the arm uprobes support
- From: William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com>
- To: David Long <dave dot long at linaro dot org>
- Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh dot kamboju at linaro dot org>, "systemtap at sourceware dot org" <systemtap at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:11:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: Segmenation fault for systemtap tests using the arm uprobes support
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5229DF78 dot 4060301 at redhat dot com> <5229E091 dot 1090802 at linaro dot org> <52681E03 dot 8080509 at redhat dot com> <52701F7A dot 8070102 at linaro dot org> <527956C8 dot 9050401 at redhat dot com> <527986F9 dot 7030204 at linaro dot org> <527A5F1F dot 6060000 at redhat dot com> <527A66EF dot 2050800 at linaro dot org> <527A6F63 dot 3070004 at redhat dot com> <527D2971 dot 9040103 at linaro dot org>
On 11/08/2013 01:12 PM, David Long wrote:
> On 11/06/13 11:33, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 11/06/2013 10:57 AM, David Long wrote:
>>> On 11/06/13 10:24, William Cohen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> With the uprobe-v2 version I only saw one test that appeared to fail because of a sigsegv:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you testing on the same hardware? It's conceivable that could make a difference, especially if the number of CPU's is different.
>>>
>>
>
> I wouldn't expect those options to make a difference for uprobes. They might for kprobes.
>
> I just finally found the bug in ARM uretprobe's. It's a simple fix.
>
> -dl
>
Hi Dave,
Are there updated ARM uprobe-v3 patches somewhere? I would be happy to try them. out.
-Will