This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [pcp] suitability of PCP for event tracing
- From: nathans at aconex dot com
- To: Greg Banks <gnb at evostor dot com>
- Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>, pcp at oss dot sgi dot com, systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:21:53 +1000 (EST)
- Subject: Re: [pcp] suitability of PCP for event tracing
----- "Greg Banks" <gnb@evostor.com> wrote:
> Sure we could do it in pmproxy, but I don't see what it buys us other
> than not having to start one more daemon in the init script?
>From someone who is administering a number of sites (ie. me) that would
want to use both, it's a big win. One less open port to register & worry
about, get to share all the code for dealing with multiplexing requests
already ... *shrug* ... why not? Seems like a no-brainer choice - just
inject new code at pmproxy.c line 320 and 350 for web clients.
cheers.
--
Nathan