This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: question regarding accessing a target variable


Hi,

Although the "volatile" directive as in
<http://sources.redhat.com/systemtap/wiki/TipContextVariables> works in
most cases, it doesn't help if the target variable is used to merely
cast a function parameter as something else. For example, if I have a
probe to the following function:

void dummy_function(void *a) {
	typedef struct {
		int	x;
		int	y;
	} b_t; 
	b_t *b = (b_t*)a;
	 ...
}

I can't access the target variables x and y in a systemtap script using
$b->x and $b->y (I get " semantic error: not accessible at this
address").

Is there any support in the systemtap script language that lets me
access x and y without having to write a separate embedded-c function
for each as follows?

%{
	typedef struct {
		int	x;
		int	y;
	} b_t; 
%}

function get_x:long (a:long) %{
	b_t *b = (b_t *)(long)THIS->a;
	THIS->__retvalue = deref(sizeof(b->x), &(b->x));
	if (0) {
deref_fault:
		CONTEXT->last_error = "pointer dereference fault";
	}
%}

function get_y:long (a:long) %{
	b_t *b = (b_t *)(long)THIS->a;
	THIS->__retvalue = deref(sizeof(b->y), &(b->y));
	if (0) {
deref_fault:
		CONTEXT->last_error = "pointer dereference fault";
	}
%}

Or, if you see a simpler method to this, that'll also be helpful.

Kai


-----Original Message-----
From: Kai Wong 
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 4:25 PM
To: 'systemtap@sources.redhat.com'
Cc: 'Frank Ch. Eigler'
Subject: RE: question regarding accessing a target variable
Importance: High

FChE wrote:
> It should not, in any material way.  You can confirm with measurements
> of course, or by looking over the assembly/object code before & after.

It works, without any measurable performance degradation. Thank you very
much!!
-Kai

-----Original Message-----
From: Kai Wong 
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 5:29 PM
To: 'systemtap@sources.redhat.com'
Cc: 'Frank Ch. Eigler'
Subject: RE: question regarding accessing a target variable

FChE wrote:
> I jotted some melancholy notes on this in the wiki.
> http://sources.redhat.com/systemtap/wiki/TipContextVariables

If none of the other options applies or works, but I can modify the
source of the probed software, does
inserting inline-assembly directives as shown in that example slow down
the performance of the probed software when not probed (assuming the
"volatile" directives stays)?

-Kai

-----Original Message-----
From: Kai Wong 
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 2:29 PM
To: 'systemtap@sources.redhat.com'
Cc: 'Frank Ch. Eigler'
Subject: question regarding accessing a target variable

Hi,

I try to access a target variable (e.g., block, which is a c local
variable within a probed function), but no matter what line number I
place the probe within the function (e.g., probe
module("vxglm").statement("vxg_recv_block_grant@/home2/kwong/glm-bld/50m
p3_clustrace/kernel/glm/smp/glmbpxy.c:67")), I get the following
message:

semantic error: not accessible at this address: identifier '$block' at
/usr/share/systemtap/tapset/glm/msgsup.stp:20:123

that target variable was actually assigned a valid value and referenced
in many different lines within the probed function. I have no trouble
with other target variables that are c local variables.

What can I do to make a c local variable more accessible to systemtap as
a target variable?

Kai 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]