This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug testsuite/5544] New: testing systemtap.stress/current.stp shutdown by eof


On ia64, sometimes systemtap.stress/current.stp test fails due to eof.
---
Pass 1: parsed user script and 38 library script(s) in 242usr/5sys/248real ms.
Pass 2: analyzed script: 863 probe(s), 3 function(s), 0 embed(s), 1 global(s) in
 3936usr/589sys/4533real ms.
Pass 3: translated to C into "/tmp/stap4Yg92X/stap_cbe6e75d38cbeaf3605ce980bfb64
fb1_298670.c" in 28usr/2sys/30real ms.
Pass 4: compiled C into "stap_cbe6e75d38cbeaf3605ce980bfb64fb1_298670.ko" in 418
7usr/227sys/4232real ms.
Pass 5: starting run.
systemtap starting probe
PASS: systemtap.stress/current.stp startup
PASS: systemtap.stress/current.stp load generation
WARNING: Number of errors: 0, skipped probes: 595
systemtap ending probe
count = 4030760
sum = 23622172
min = 2
max = 15
avg = 5
systemtap test success
systemtap test success
Pass 5: run completed in 23usr/152sys/11225real ms.
FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp shutdown (eof)
---
But the test itself succeeded.

I found the WARNING message was outputted before ending probe's message.
And stap_run procedure could not handle this pattern.

-- 
           Summary: testing systemtap.stress/current.stp shutdown by eof
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: testsuite
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: mhiramat at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5544

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]