This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy dot dunlap at oracle dot com>
- To: Richard Purdie <rpurdie at rpsys dot net>
- Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at osdl dot org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj at krystal dot dyndns dot org>, Thomas at maccavity dot nachtwache dot org, Christoph at maccavity dot nachtwache dot org, Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at suse dot de>, linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org, Greg at maccavity dot nachtwache dot org, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh at mbligh dot org>, Hellwig <hch at infradead dot org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds at osdl dot org>, Ingo at maccavity dot nachtwache dot org, ltt-dev at shafik dot org, systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com, Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba dot org>, Gleixner <tglx at linutronix dot de>, Douglas Niehaus <niehaus at eecs dot ku dot edu>, Molnar <mingo at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:49:43 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives
- Organization: Oracle Linux Eng.
- References: <11697417541743-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> <20070127021834.e26e955d.akpm@osdl.org> <20070127181116.GA5158@Krystal> <20070127120512.04a98fcd.akpm@osdl.org> <1170095809.5833.72.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:36:49 +0000 Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 12:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500
> > Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising.
> > > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/
> >
> > Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a
> > number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation
> > with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually
> > work. Good luck ;)
>
> FWIW, OpenEmbedded (http://www.openembedded.org/) is a very capable
> toolchain builder amongst other things. I built an ARM toolchain for
> Andrew a while back with it. I'm personally not sure of its support
> outside ARM/i386 since I don't have hardware to test any other output
> but others use it for a variety of targets and new ones are simple to
> add due to its design.
>
> I could probably arrange to share an ARM toolchain if there was
> demand...
I'd certainly like to see/use it.
---
~Randy