This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
RE: Recent test results
- From: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com>
- To: "Martin Hunt" <hunt at redhat dot com>, "William Cohen" <wcohen at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:49:53 -0800
- Subject: RE: Recent test results
Martin,
Can you mail your fix so I can verify the same on my Ia64 box.
-thanks,
Anil
>-----Original Message-----
>From: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
>[mailto:systemtap-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Martin Hunt
>Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 12:36 PM
>To: William Cohen
>Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
>Subject: Re: Recent test results
>
>On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:35 -0500, William Cohen wrote:
>> Tried out testing a current snapshot of systemtap (20051111) on some
>> systems.
>[...]
>> Looking into why some of the x86_64 tests start failing when all are
>> run. It looks like it is failing in the same way as the ia64 tests
>> that Anil ran earlier in the week; things go wrong with simple.exp.
>> Also noticed that x86_64 version failed to report the systemtap
>> version.
>I got the same results as you.
>
>I'm certainly not an expect expert, but a quick look at stap_run.exp
>shows a major flaw. I made a quick fix and now I get:
>
>Running ./systemtap.samples/syscalls2.exp ...
>Running ./systemtap.samples/sysopen.exp ...
>Running ./systemtap.samples/transport.exp ...
>
> === systemtap Summary ===
>
># of expected passes 107
>
>kernel version: 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp
>systemtap translator version: version 0.4.2 built 2005-11-11
>
>
>
>