This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the systemtap project.
RE: [PATCH] Allow a jprobe to coexist with kprobes
- From: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com>
- To: "Vara Prasad" <prasadav at us dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: "Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli" <amavin at redhat dot com>, "SystemTAP" <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:36:08 -0700
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] Allow a jprobe to coexist with kprobes
>
>Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:
>
>>>Two jprobes cannot be
>>>registered at the same address however.
>>>
>>>
>>Are there any plans to remove above restrictions in future?
>>
>>
>I am not sure why we need to register two jprobes at the entry of a
>function.
>Do you have some practical case where this feature would be useful?
I guess we are allowing multiple tapsets to coexist in the system at the
same time.
If that is correct, then in this case two independent tapset might be
interested to register a jprobe at the entry of the same function. Does
this answer your question?
-Anil