This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Application of instrument in the kernel


I am working on a paper that provides a couple examples on how to instrument kernel code with kprobes. I asked for some suggestions on things that would be interesting to instrument.

I ended up instrumenting the generic_make_request function that is used by the block io devices.

Some of the other suggestion I got:

-Measure the latency to handle do hardware-interrupt processing. This is the reason that I did measured the cost of kprobe and jprobe to determine how much overhead this would add.

-Time to do a context switch in the kerne/sched.c:schedule(). In this case there are specific places in the function where things happen and having markers for those points might be useful.

-Instrument the mm/memory.c:handle_mm_fault() to find out which virtual addresses are causing the page faults. Could look at the return value of the function to determine whether it was a minor or major page fault.


One of the kernel engineers pointed me to this archived email:


http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=110902672620626&w=2

The referenced pdf document (http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/bic-beta-patch.pdf) has a refernce to some probes kprobes written to track down the problem:

http://develop er.osdl.org/shemminger/tcpprobe.tar.gz

It uses jprobes to track down the problem.

-Will


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]